Next: Conclusions
Up: Experiments and Results
Previous: Results of the classifier
The output of the combination of the two algorithms is the
intersection of both result sets. The balls detected must be found
both by the ball classifier as well as the attention algorithm.
First, the foci are found in the image. Then, the classifier tries to
detect balls at these specific regions.
The results of the combination are shown in
Table II. The test data is composed of a set of
60 realistic RoboCup images for each ball, where there is exactly
one ball in each image. These were taken with backgrounds of
different lighting (color) and complexity. The classifier
searches areas of the first 5 foci found by the attention
algorithm.
Table II:
Detection rate of combined algorithm. Column 2
(attention) shows which of the 5 foci points to the ball
(average).
|
Att. |
Classifier only |
Att. and Class. |
|
|
Found |
False Pos. |
Found |
False Pos. |
red Ball |
1.0 |
45/60 |
52 |
45/60 |
3 |
white ball |
1.0 |
44/60 |
45 |
41/60 |
0 |
yel/red b. |
1.2 |
57/60 |
63 |
55/60 |
20 |
Total |
1.07 |
146/180 |
160 |
141/180 |
23 |
Figure 7:
Top: Input images including round objects.
Middle: False alarms in filtered images. Bottom left:
False positives eliminated, ball not found. Bottom right:
False detections eliminated.
|
The combination is very useful in eliminating false positives in
images. This is shown in Fig. 7, where the
false positives we were suffering from with the classifier alone
are eliminated. The focus of attention is calculated in ca 1.5
sec. and the classification at these region of interest needs
200 ms (image size: 240 320, Pentium-M 1.7 GHz).
The bulk of the running time of VOCUS is taken up by the feature
computations. These may be parallelized by splitting up the processing
to several CPUs [9] or with dedicated hardware
[18] what makes the system real-time capable. We
consider this for future work.
Next: Conclusions
Up: Experiments and Results
Previous: Results of the classifier
root
2005-01-27